On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:

quoted text
> Yeah, for memory hot remove that makes sense. A comment
> might be in order, at least a reference to the orphaned
> page code in vmscan.c.

Right. The surrounding comments in mm/migrate.c also need to be made 
consistent. The comment before is now slightly off. Could you do another 
patch Shaohua with better comments?
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/