Al Boldi wrote:
quoted text > Greetings!
>
> data=ordered mode has proven reliable over the years, and it does this by
> ordering filedata flushes before metadata flushes. But this sometimes
> causes contention in the order of a 10x slowdown for certain apps, either
> due to the misuse of fsync or due to inherent behaviour like db's, as well
> as inherent starvation issues exposed by the data=ordered mode.
>
> data=writeback mode alleviates data=order mode slowdowns, but only works
> per-mount and is too dangerous to run as a default mode.
>
> This RFC proposes to introduce a tunable which allows to disable fsync and
> changes ordered into writeback writeout on a per-process basis like this:
>
> echo 1 > /proc/`pidof process`/softsync
>
>
> Your comments are much welcome!
This is basically a kernel workaround for stupid app behavior. It wouldn't be
the first time we've provided such an option, but we shouldn't do it without a
very good justification. At the very least, we need a test case that
demonstrates the problem and benchmark results that prove that this approach
actually fixes it. I suspect we can find a cleaner fix for the problem.
-- Chris
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode , Chris Snook , (Thu Jan 24, 6:19 pm)