Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Snook
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 6:19 pm

Al Boldi wrote:

This is basically a kernel workaround for stupid app behavior.  It wouldn't be 
the first time we've provided such an option, but we shouldn't do it without a 
very good justification.  At the very least, we need a test case that 
demonstrates the problem and benchmark results that prove that this approach 
actually fixes it.  I suspect we can find a cleaner fix for the problem.

	-- Chris
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Thu Jan 24, 2:58 pm)
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Chris Snook, (Thu Jan 24, 6:19 pm)
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Andreas Dilger, (Thu Jan 24, 11:47 pm)
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jan 30, 5:32 pm)