On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:Since I already had two kernel developers asking about the merge window and whether people (including me) traveling will impact it, the plan right now is to keep the impact pretty minimal. So yes, it will probably extend the window from the regular two weeks, but *hopefully* not by more than a few days. I'm going to try to merge at least some stuff while I'm in Melbourne, and I'd expect that most of the stuff that happens during LCA is code that is already pending to be merged (that's how the merge window is _supposed_ to work, after all, but with the 2.6.24 release cycle being longer than usual I suspect it's actually true in practice too). And the second week of the merge window I'll be back again. If I have bad bandwidth or am just goofing off during LCA, or if I end up being too jetlagged to merge well after, that will obviously push out things. And the same thing obviously goes for any other maintainer in the same condition. I'd hope that the git users to be in fairly good condition (with hopefully much of the stuff pending for 2.6.25 ready to go), and would worry more about people like Andrew in particular. So let's see how this works out. In short: I'm hoping that there won't be a big impact, but hey, let's be flexible. Who knows what happens.. Linus --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Ingo Molnar | [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
