Re: [PATCH 5/9] bfs: move function prototype to the proper header file

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tigran Aivazian
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 4:22 pm

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:


because dump_imap() is just a BFS' internal helper (for debugging purposes=
=20
only btw) to dump the inode map via printk. Why should it be moved into=20
the header, i.e. where one expects to see things potentially visible by=20
the rest of the kernel?


maybe this script should be simplified to not complain at things like=20
that, which are best left to the author of the code to decide which=20
declaration should be where?

Kind regards
Tigran
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/9] bfs: assorted cleanups, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:31 pm)
[PATCH 1/9] bfs: remove a useless variable, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 2/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/inode.c, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 3/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/bfs.h, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 4/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/dir.c, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 6/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/file.c, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 8/9] bfs: remove multiple assignments, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 9/9] bfs: use the proper header file for inclusion, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/9] bfs: move function prototype to the proper ..., Tigran Aivazian, (Thu Jan 24, 4:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/9] bfs: assorted cleanups, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Fri Jan 25, 3:25 am)