Re: [PATCH 5/9] bfs: move function prototype to the proper header file

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dmitri Vorobiev
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 4:13 pm

Heikki Orsila пишет:

Care to explain why?

Following is an explanation why the contrary is probably true:

1) We have lots of precedents in existing code:

dmvo@cipher:~/Projects/misc/linux$ git-grep 'extern void' include | wc -l
5523
dmvo@cipher:~/Projects/misc/linux$

2) Linus' Coding style does not mandate what you requested.

3) The checkpatch.pl did not complain at this particular patch.

Thanks,

Dmitri

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/9] bfs: assorted cleanups, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:31 pm)
[PATCH 1/9] bfs: remove a useless variable, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 2/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/inode.c, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 3/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/bfs.h, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 4/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/dir.c, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 6/9] bfs: coding style cleanup in fs/bfs/file.c, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 8/9] bfs: remove multiple assignments, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
[PATCH 9/9] bfs: use the proper header file for inclusion, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 3:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/9] bfs: move function prototype to the proper ..., Dmitri Vorobiev, (Thu Jan 24, 4:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/9] bfs: assorted cleanups, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Fri Jan 25, 3:25 am)