On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:57 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

quoted text
> My usual algorithm here is to
> 
> 1: queue all the patches and send the ones which have a maintainer to
>    that maintainer until he merges it.
> 
> 2: If the patches have a dependency upon (say) a VFS patch then I'll
>    merge the VFS patch and will then goto 1.
> 
> I don't think this particular patch has a VFS depencency so sure, merge
> away.  You'll probably see that I merged it anyway, but I'll drop it again
> when I see it turn up in your tree (I used to resync with the git trees
> at least daily, but I now do this far less frequently because it is such
> torture because everyone is paddling in everyone else's puddle).

Merged.  Thanks.

Shaggy
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/