Re: [patch 19/26] mount options: fix jfs

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...>
Cc: <miklos@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 5:57 pm

> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:15:01 -0600 Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

My usual algorithm here is to

1: queue all the patches and send the ones which have a maintainer to
   that maintainer until he merges it.

2: If the patches have a dependency upon (say) a VFS patch then I'll
   merge the VFS patch and will then goto 1.

I don't think this particular patch has a VFS depencency so sure, merge
away.  You'll probably see that I merged it anyway, but I'll drop it again
when I see it turn up in your tree (I used to resync with the git trees
at least daily, but I now do this far less frequently because it is such
torture because everyone is paddling in everyone else's puddle).
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 19/26] mount options: fix jfs, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Jan 24, 3:34 pm)
Re: [patch 19/26] mount options: fix jfs, Dave Kleikamp, (Thu Jan 24, 5:15 pm)
Re: [patch 19/26] mount options: fix jfs, Andrew Morton, (Thu Jan 24, 5:57 pm)
Re: [patch 19/26] mount options: fix jfs, Dave Kleikamp, (Thu Jan 24, 6:17 pm)