Re: [PATCH 06/20 -v5] add notrace annotations for NMI routines

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...>, John Stultz <johnstul@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 5:58 pm

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:


This never had to do with the clocksource. The tracer itself isn't atomic
against NMIs. hmm, it may actually be. It does a tracer disable for the
CPU by an atomic_inc and this would prevent the NMI from causing harm.

I'll test without this patch and see what happens when I turn on a high
rate of NMIS.

I still want to add a bit more notraces around for the simple
reason of cleaning up the output and prehaps speeding up the code a bit.

-- Steve

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 06/20 -v5] add notrace annotations for NMI routines, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Jan 23, 12:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 06/20 -v5] add notrace annotations for NMI routines, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Jan 23, 5:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH 06/20 -v5] add notrace annotations for NMI routines, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Jan 23, 5:58 pm)