Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...>, John Stultz <johnstul@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...>
Hi -
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 06:58:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
The commonality I imagine is not in what sorts of reports they create,
or where they complete the formatting for and end-user. It is solely
whether the kernel-side instrumentation sites can be represented by
individual markers, so that these particular tools as well as future
ones don't need to keep inserting custom code in similar or even the
same places.
- FChE
--