Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: <mingo@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <apw@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 6:57 am

On (23/01/08 11:45), Andi Kleen didst pronounce:

hmm, just a removal of (X86_SUMMIT || X86_GENERICARCH). When I was testing
this I was probably using a PC-compatible configuration as that is what I
was enabling at the time. It's a similar restriction for BOOT_IOREMAP.


Presumably a GENERICARCH configuration


I don't think it has bit-rotted. I was just not using a GENERICARCH
configuration.


Yeah, elm3b6 from test.kernel.org is an Opteron-based NUMA machine. Oddly
it's good to know that the nature of the crash has not changed.


Unfortunately, I don't have access to a Summit box so I cannot verify.


Grand. I'll get back to this soon and see what can be done.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Wed Jan 23, 6:57 am)