Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Mel Gorman <mel@...>, Fengguang Wu <wfg@...>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...>, <jplatte@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org <linux-ext4@...>, <James.Bottomley@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...>, Neil Brown <neilb@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 - 7:40 pm

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:25:15AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:

The IO should pass straight through simple linear targets like that without
needing to get broken up, so I wouldn't expect those patches to make any
difference in this particular case.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX, Martin Knoblauch, (Tue Jan 22, 11:25 am)
Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX, Alasdair G Kergon, (Tue Jan 22, 7:40 pm)