Re: The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Stable Team <stable@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 - 4:19 pm

On 01/22/2008 07:35 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

Here's the 2.6.23 version:


Subject: x86: fix missing exception entry for SMP alternatives in futex macros
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The exception fixup for the futex macros __futex_atomic_op2 and
futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() is missing an entry when the lock
prefix is replaced by a NOP via SMP alternatives.

Chuck Ebert tracked this down from the information provided in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429412

The solution is to add another fixup after the LOCK_PREFIX, so both
the LOCK and NOP case have their own entry in the exception table.

The solution was pointed out by Andi Kleen.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

---
 include/asm-i386/futex.h |    8 ++++----
 include/asm-x86_64/futex.h |    8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/futex.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-i386/futex.h	2008-01-22 13:13:10.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/futex.h	2008-01-22 13:13:49.000000000 +0100
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 "1:	movl	%2, %0\n\
 	movl	%0, %3\n"					\
 	insn "\n"						\
-"2:	" LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\
+"2:	" LOCK_PREFIX "\n 5: cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\
 	jnz	1b\n\
 3:	.section .fixup,\"ax\"\n\
 4:	mov	%5, %1\n\
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 	.previous\n\
 	.section __ex_table,\"a\"\n\
 	.align	8\n\
-	.long	1b,4b,2b,4b\n\
+	.long	1b,4b,2b,4b,5b,4b\n\
 	.previous"						\
 	: "=&a" (oldval), "=&r" (ret), "+m" (*uaddr),		\
 	  "=&r" (tem)						\
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(int __user
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
-		"1:	" LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgl %3, %1		\n"
+		"1:	" LOCK_PREFIX "\n 4: cmpxchgl %3, %1	\n"
 
 		"2:	.section .fixup, \"ax\"			\n"
 		"3:	mov     %2, %0				\n"
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(int __user
 
 		"	.section __ex_table, \"a\"		\n"
 		"	.align  8				\n"
-		"	.long   1b,3b				\n"
+		"	.long   1b,3b,4b,3b			\n"
 		"	.previous				\n"
 
 		: "=a" (oldval), "+m" (*uaddr)
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-x86_64/futex.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-x86_64/futex.h	2008-01-22 13:13:10.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-x86_64/futex.h	2008-01-22 13:13:49.000000000 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 "1:	movl	%2, %0\n\
 	movl	%0, %3\n"					\
 	insn "\n"						\
-"2:	" LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\
+"2:	" LOCK_PREFIX "\n 5: cmpxchgl %3, %2\n\
 	jnz	1b\n\
 3:	.section .fixup,\"ax\"\n\
 4:	mov	%5, %1\n\
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 	.previous\n\
 	.section __ex_table,\"a\"\n\
 	.align	8\n\
-	.quad	1b,4b,2b,4b\n\
+	.quad	1b,4b,2b,4b,5b,4b\n\
 	.previous"						\
 	: "=&a" (oldval), "=&r" (ret), "=m" (*uaddr),		\
 	  "=&r" (tem)						\
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(int __user
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
-		"1:	" LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchgl %3, %1		\n"
+		"1:	" LOCK_PREFIX "\n 4: cmpxchgl %3, %1	\n"
 
 		"2:	.section .fixup, \"ax\"			\n"
 		"3:	mov     %2, %0				\n"
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(int __user
 
 		"	.section __ex_table, \"a\"		\n"
 		"	.align  8				\n"
-		"	.quad   1b,3b				\n"
+		"	.quad   1b,3b,4b,3b			\n"
 		"	.previous				\n"
 
 		: "=a" (oldval), "=m" (*uaddr)
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Jan 21, 4:47 pm)
Re: The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Jan 22, 8:35 am)
Re: The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Chuck Ebbert, (Tue Jan 22, 4:19 pm)
Re: The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Jan 21, 5:25 pm)