Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 - 3:13 pm

On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Al Boldi wrote:

I over simplified.  data=ordered means that all data blocks are written before 
the metadata that references them commits.

So, if you add 1GB to a fileA in a transaction and then run fsync(fileB) in 
the same transaction, the 1GB from fileA is sent to disk (and waited on) 
before the fsync on fileB returns.

-chris
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Al Boldi, (Sat Jan 19, 2:14 pm)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)..., (Sat Jan 19, 2:53 pm)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Al Boldi, (Sat Jan 19, 4:57 pm)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)..., (Sat Jan 19, 6:17 pm)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 22, 6:10 am)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Al Boldi, (Tue Jan 22, 9:23 am)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Chris Mason, (Tue Jan 22, 10:25 am)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Al Boldi, (Tue Jan 22, 2:54 pm)
Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22, Chris Mason, (Tue Jan 22, 3:13 pm)