Re: [PATCH -v7 2/2] Update ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...>
Cc: <linux-mm@...>, <jakob@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <valdis.kletnieks@...>, <riel@...>, <ksm@...>, <staubach@...>, <torvalds@...>, <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <akpm@...>, <protasnb@...>, <miklos@...>, <r.e.wolff@...>, <hidave.darkstar@...>, <hch@...>
Date: Monday, January 21, 2008 - 9:51 pm

2008/1/22, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>:

I believe that the C89 style is more common for the Linux kernel, so
I've used the out-of-scope variable declaration.


Earlier I had a request to remove any "changelog-style" comments from the code.


The MS_ASYNC and MS_SYNC flags are mutually exclusive, that is why I
did not use the "else-if" here. Moreover, this function itself checks
that they never come together.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -v7 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times, Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 8:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v7 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file..., Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 9:40 pm)
[PATCH -v7 2/2] Update ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files, Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 8:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v7 2/2] Update ctime and mtime for memory-mapped..., Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 10:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v7 2/2] Update ctime and mtime for memory-mapped..., Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 9:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v7 2/2] Update ctime and mtime for memory-mapped..., Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 9:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v7 2/2] Update ctime and mtime for memory-mapped..., Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 10:07 pm)
[PATCH -v7 1/2] Massive code cleanup of sys_msync(), Anton Salikhmetov, (Mon Jan 21, 8:32 pm)