login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
January
»
22
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Georgi Chulkov <g.chulkov@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-ide@...>, Mark Lord <liml@...>
Subject:
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
Date: Monday, January 21, 2008 - 9:31 pm
On Monday 21 January 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: [...]
quoted text
> > Old IDE says it works for PATA. For SATA I can see it might need more > > care and you might simply not be able to get the info. > > Old IDE often locks up the machine hard after timeouts. I'm all for
Could you point me to some bugreports? I would like to know more about hosts/conditions for which it happens.
quoted text
> gathering more info but benefit vs. risk equation just doesn't look good > here. Why take risk for a rare device which forgets to raise IRQ on > media error? If such behavior is wide spread among PATA drives && we > can verify that TF register access after timeout is safe for PATA > controllers, sure, but currently we aren't sure about either.
Thanks, Bart --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Georgi Chulkov
, (Sun Jan 13, 6:19 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Andrew Morton
, (Tue Jan 15, 6:54 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Georgi Chulkov
, (Tue Jan 22, 4:29 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Jan 15, 7:35 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 3:56 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Jan 21, 9:02 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 9:14 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Jan 21, 10:14 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 10:31 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Jan 21, 12:47 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 1:02 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz...
, (Mon Jan 21, 9:31 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Jan 21, 9:39 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 9:36 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 10:08 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Jan 21, 1:27 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 8:31 pm)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Jan 21, 10:33 am)
Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Jan 21, 12:44 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Eric W. Biederman
[PATCH 02/10] sysfs: Support for preventing unmounts.
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
david
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Antonio Almeida
HTB accuracy for high speed
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 1 (socket set...
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
885 guests
online.
Online users
zeekec
Syndicate