Re: W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Fries <david@...>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, January 21, 2008 - 9:08 pm

David Fries wrote:

Millikelvins would have the nice property of never being negative.  :)

	-hpa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API, David Fries, (Mon Jan 21, 7:15 pm)
Re: W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue Jan 22, 5:06 pm)
Re: W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Jan 21, 9:08 pm)
Re: W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Jan 21, 11:11 pm)
Re: W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jan 23, 12:22 am)
Re: W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue Jan 22, 5:07 pm)
Re: W1: w1_slave units, standardize 1C or .001C? Break API, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue Jan 22, 5:12 pm)