On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:20:46 -0800
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Introduce printk_address to X86_32 in a simplified form for
> now.  Reformat X86_64 printk_address to avoid two declarations.
> 
> Change the printk formats on X86_32 and 64 to be similar.

I'm not entirely convinced on this; I need to look closer but it appears the 32 bit version 
doesn't use the "reliable" argument to print a ? in front of the dubious backtrace entries;
that would be sort of a step backwards; (

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/