KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
quoted text
> Hi
> 
>> +static void __sched
>> +account_global_scheduler_latency(struct task_struct *tsk, int usecs)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	int firstnonnull = MAXLR + 1;
>> +
>> +	if (!tsk->latency_reason.reason)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* skip kernel threads for now */
>> +	if (!tsk->mm)
>> +		return;
> 
> Why do you ignore kernel thread?
> 
> may be, some network filesystem use kernel thread for local I/O.
> What do you think it?

kernel threads (by themselves) don't tend to result in user visible latency...
at least that's my assumption so far... if you think I'm wrong... I'm open to be shown
that we should count them.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/