Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>, lkml <linux-kernel@...>, <dipankar@...>, akpm <akpm@...>
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 8:38 pm

On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:

At first glance, this can't happen because all CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU depends on 
CONFIG_HOTPLUG or selects it, for all archs.

But CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP selects CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, without requiring 
CONFIG_HOTPLUG: turning on SUSPEND or HIBERNATION does this.

Perhaps it's time to revisit reverse-depends for select?

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch, Randy Dunlap, (Sat Jan 19, 3:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch, Sam Ravnborg, (Sat Jan 19, 5:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch, Rusty Russell, (Sun Jan 20, 8:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Jan 21, 7:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Jan 22, 1:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Jan 22, 12:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix section mismatch, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Jan 21, 3:08 pm)