login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
January
»
21
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@...>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@...>, <mingo@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <apw@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 8:38 pm
Hi
quoted text
> A fix[1] was merged to the x86.git tree that allowed NUMA kernels to boot > on normal x86 machines (and not just NUMA-Q, Summit etc.). I took a look > at the restrictions on setting NUMA on x86 to see if they could be lifted.
Interesting! I will test tomorrow. I think this patch become easy to the porting of fakenuma. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Jan 18, 11:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sun Jan 20, 8:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Tue Jan 22, 10:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Jan 23, 6:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sat Jan 26, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Sat Jan 26, 1:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sun Jan 27, 2:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Jan 29, 7:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sun Feb 3, 5:32 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Jan 28, 11:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Mon Jan 28, 10:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sat Jan 26, 1:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Jan 23, 6:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Wed Jan 23, 11:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Mon Jan 21, 10:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Jan 21, 10:49 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Mon Jan 21, 12:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Andi Kleen
, (Sat Jan 19, 2:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Sat Jan 19, 12:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Jan 22, 9:33 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Jan 23, 6:28 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Andi Kleen
, (Wed Jan 23, 6:45 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Jan 23, 6:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Andi Kleen
, (Wed Jan 23, 7:15 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Jan 23, 7:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Andi Kleen
, (Wed Jan 23, 9:48 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Jan 23, 10:15 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Andi Kleen
, (Wed Jan 23, 7:11 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Jan 22, 8:14 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Jan 22, 8:29 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Jan 22, 11:39 am)
[PATCH 2/2] Allow any x86 sub-architecture type to set CONFI...
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Jan 18, 11:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Allow any x86 sub-architecture type to set C...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Jan 18, 12:17 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] Do not require CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G to set CONFIG_N...
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Jan 18, 11:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Do not require CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G to set CONF...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Jan 18, 12:17 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Linus Torvalds
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
Ingo Molnar
[patch 03/13] syslets: generic kernel bits
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
git
:
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gregory Haskins
[RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
1042 guests
online.
Online users
Jeremy
cofebarker
vv_ivango
Syndicate