Alan Cox wrote:Or RM Cobol, which is also available on Linux. Both of these require significant expense in new licences. I don't know of this thing, but I have looked, on behalf of a colleague, for tools that can compile his existing COBOL source, and found only partial solutions (i.e. found nothing.) Well, I'm whispering: The cost is that something desirable but incomplete would be removed. While it's there it's a constant source of irritation to those in the know. Once removed it can be forgotten. So the cost is really that iBCS2 compatibility becomes less likely. What's the benefit in removing it? Up to 20 cycles per exec? That's nothing. --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| WANG Cong | Re: WANTED: kernel projects for CS students |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10606] 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ACPI fails to load SDT. - Dell M1530 |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Stephen Tweedie | Unmounting root (no kidding!) [was: Some Linux problems---solved] |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
