Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » January » 20

Re: I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT dependence problem

Previous thread: [PATCH 0/6] RFC: Typesafe callbacks by Rusty Russell on Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 5:46 am. (23 messages)

Next thread: Re: "problem" with mdacon by Geert Uytterhoeven on Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 7:08 am. (1 message)
[view original message]
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...>
To: Adam Turk <bofh1234@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <i2c@...>
Subject: Re: I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT dependence problem
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 6:11 am

Hi Adam,


The help text says:


"This driver is a light version of i2c-parport.  It doesn't depend on

the parport driver, and uses direct I/O access instead."


So I think that the (lack of) dependencies is correct. We don't want to

force the user to select PARPORT (and built the parport driver) to get

access to the i2c-parport-light driver which does NOT need this parport

driver.


--

Jean Delvare

--
Previous thread: [PATCH 0/6] RFC: Typesafe callbacks by Rusty Russell on Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 5:46 am. (23 messages)

Next thread: Re: "problem" with mdacon by Geert Uytterhoeven on Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 7:08 am. (1 message)