On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:16:25PM +1030, David Newall wrote:I suppose if they update their cash registers they will just go with fully Linux binaries. It's not a big difference, but why do unnecessary work on all Linux kernels? There are a lot of Linux machines out there and if all of them only do a little unnecessary work each fork() over a year it adds up to really a lot of wasted cycles. Especially since the few people who might really need it can easily readd it. But Linux is not good for this currently, at least not unless you add a significant patch (which I'm not sure does even exist for modern 2.6; iBCS was mainly deployed on 2.4 kernels). And when you add that patch you can easily readd the strcmps too. You're worried about this patch generating headlines? -Andi --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| WANG Cong | Re: WANTED: kernel projects for CS students |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10606] 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ACPI fails to load SDT. - Dell M1530 |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Stephen Tweedie | Unmounting root (no kidding!) [was: Some Linux problems---solved] |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
