Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...>, Chodorenko Michail <misha@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 12:35 am

Andi Kleen wrote:

I don't understand this, and it seems wrong.  Most machines spend most
of their time doing nothing, or as close to nothing as they're allowed. 
Idle, in other words.  Isn't it the case that an idle machine will use
less power when throttled than when not?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Chodorenko Michail, (Fri Jan 18, 3:06 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Andi Kleen, (Fri Jan 18, 5:11 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Matt Mackall, (Fri Jan 18, 8:27 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Andi Kleen, (Fri Jan 18, 9:15 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Matt Mackall, (Sat Jan 19, 12:10 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jan 19, 12:27 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sun Jan 20, 7:18 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Matt Mackall, (Sat Jan 19, 12:40 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jan 19, 12:54 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, David Newall, (Sun Jan 20, 12:35 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Andi Kleen, (Sun Jan 20, 1:13 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, David Newall, (Sun Jan 20, 1:23 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Lennart Sorensen, (Sun Jan 20, 4:53 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core, Andi Kleen, (Sun Jan 20, 1:42 am)