Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: <sct@...>, <akpm@...>, <adilger@...>, <linux-ext4@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 2:26 pm

El Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> escribió:


But isn't that the whole purpose of having ext4 snapshots in the stable kernel - to
allow people to try it?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Jan 1, 9:32 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Diego Calleja, (Wed Jan 2, 2:26 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Jan 2, 5:16 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Trond Myklebust, (Wed Jan 2, 5:31 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jan 2, 1:41 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Jan 2, 3:51 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Eric Sandeen, (Wed Jan 2, 6:43 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN, Eric Anopolsky, (Wed Jan 2, 5:51 pm)