Re: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>, Paul Rolland <rol@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <rol@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 9:11 am

FYI - another quirky Quanta motherboard from HP, with DMI readings 
reported to me.

-------- Original Message --------
Date: 	Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:23:27 +1030
From: 	Joel Stanley <joel.stanley@adelaide.edu.au>
To: 	David P. Reed <dpreed@reed.com>
Subject: 	Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)



On Dec 30, 2007 1:13 AM, David P. Reed <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:

Using port80.c, I could hard lock a HP Pavilion tx1000 laptop on the
first go. This was with ubuntu hardy's stock kernel (a 2.6.24-rc)


Quanta
30BF

Tonight, I will try compiling a kernel with these values added to your patch.

Some history, feel free to ignore if it's not relevant: ubuntu
feisty's 2.6.22 based kernel worked fine, irc. We were having issues
with sound, so tried fedora8's .23 based kernel, but this would
sporadically hard lock. Ubuntu hardy's 2.6.24 appeared fine, for the 2
hours or so I used it last night, until using the port80.c program,
obviously.

Cheers,

Joel


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port..., David P. Reed, (Wed Jan 2, 9:11 am)