On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:11:45PM +0000, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:Could you expand on how you see that being implemented, please? It doesn't feel entirely comfortable to me - providing a bus for the chip seems more direct and the platform bus not what I'd think of using for something hanging off another bus - but I think I'm just not visualising what you're thinking of properly. The multi-function device support does feel like it could be a good fit. I'd seen it discussed sometime last year but don't recall seeing anything for quite a while. Like Ben said, any pointers to current work would be appreciated. It's probably worth mentioning that in addition to what is in the current patch series these chips all also provide an audio codec which requires a reasonably substantial driver for full support. --
| Greg KH | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Greg KH | [patch 26/73] NET: Correct two mistaken skb_reset_mac_header() conversions. |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
