Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86 | KernelTrap

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Andi Kleen <andi@...>

To: Mel Gorman <mel@...>

Cc: <mingo@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <apw@...>

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86

Date: Saturday, January 19, 2008 - 2:35 am

Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> writes:

quoted text> A fix[1] was merged to the x86.git tree that allowed NUMA kernels to boot
> on normal x86 machines (and not just NUMA-Q, Summit etc.). I took a look
> at the restrictions on setting NUMA on x86 to see if they could be lifted.

The problem with i386 CONFIG_NUMA previously was not that it didn't
boot on normal non NUMA systems, but that it didn't boot on very
common NUMA systems: Opterons.  Have you tested if that is fixed now?

-Andi
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86, Mel Gorman, (Fri Jan 18, 11:35 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Jan 20, 8:38 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Jan 22, 10:04 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Wed Jan 23, 6:23 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Jan 26, 10:10 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Sat Jan 26, 1:18 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Jan 27, 2:54 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Tue Jan 29, 7:34 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Feb 3, 5:32 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jan 28, 11:02 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Jan 28, 10:57 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Jan 26, 1:10 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Wed Jan 23, 6:22 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Jan 23, 11:19 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Mon Jan 21, 10:35 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jan 21, 10:49 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Mon Jan 21, 12:27 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Andi Kleen, (Sat Jan 19, 2:35 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Sat Jan 19, 12:07 pm)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Andi Kleen, (Tue Jan 22, 9:33 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Wed Jan 23, 6:28 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 23, 6:45 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Wed Jan 23, 6:57 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 23, 7:15 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Wed Jan 23, 7:24 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 23, 9:48 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Wed Jan 23, 10:15 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 23, 7:11 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 22, 8:14 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Mel Gorman, (Tue Jan 22, 8:29 am)

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 22, 11:39 am)

[PATCH 2/2] Allow any x86 sub-architecture type to set CONFI..., Mel Gorman, (Fri Jan 18, 11:36 am)

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Allow any x86 sub-architecture type to set C..., Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jan 18, 12:17 pm)

[PATCH 1/2] Do not require CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G to set CONFIG_N..., Mel Gorman, (Fri Jan 18, 11:35 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Do not require CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G to set CONF..., Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jan 18, 12:17 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Christoph Lameter	Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Linus Torvalds	Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver opt-in
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers
Bart Van Assche	Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
git:

openbsd-misc:

linux-netdev:
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
David Miller	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Christoph Hellwig	Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2]
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 1 (socket set...

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 4 users and 556 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate