On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 22:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Sounds fine! Don't hesitate to let us know about the lower-hanging 
> > > fruit you're thinking about. Here are the main things I have so far:
> > > 
> > >     * Ideas in the existing Linux-Tiny patchset.
> > >     * Disable support for non-Intel processors in x86 (cyrix.c,
> > >       centaur.c, transmeta.c, nexgen.c, umc.c in arch/x86/kernel/cpu).
> > >       As far as I remember, I saved 15 KB when I first experimented with
> > >       this).
> > 
> > Isn't that already in -tiny?
> 
> btw., are there any pending arch/x86 bits in -tiny? (stupid question: 
> were can i get the most uptodate version of -tiny from?)

It's not a stupid question. I dropped updating the tree regulary some
time ago to focus on merging bits and then got a bit side-tracked by
this little thing called "version control".

Michael is attempting to get the tree started again and has put a quilt
up here:

http://elinux.org/images/3/3c/Tiny-quilt-2.6.23-0.tar.bz2

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/