Ric Wheeler wrote:
quoted text > Theodore Tso wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:31:48PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote:
>>> But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a
>>> myth just like the rotational energy thing. I added that to the
>>> discussion, but admitted that I haven't actually seen a disk drive
>>> write a partial sector.
>>
>> Well, it would be impossible or at least very hard to see that in
>> practice, right? My understanding is that drives do sector-level
>> checksums, so if there was a partially written sector, the checksum
>> would be bogus and the drive would return an error when you tried to
>> read from it.
>
> There is extensive per sector error correction on each sector written.
> What you would see in this case (or many, many other possible ways
> drives can corrupt media) is a "media error" on the next read.
Correct.
quoted text > You would never get back the partially written contents of that sector
> at the host.
Correct.
quoted text > Having our tools (fsck especially) be resilient in the face of media
> errors is really critical. Although I don't think the scenario of a
> partially written sector is common, media errors in general are common
> and can develop over time.
Agreed.
Jeff
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Increm... , Jeff Garzik , (Fri Jan 18, 4:34 pm)