On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:44 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:41:08PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:00 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > And mprintk the following.
> > > 
> > >  code:
> > >   DEFINE_MPRINTK(mp, 2 * 80);
> > > 
> > >   mprintk_set_header(&mp, KERN_INFO "ata%u.%2u: ", 1, 0);
> > >   mprintk_push(&mp, "ATA %d", 7);
> > >   mprintk_push(&mp, ", %u sectors\n", 1024);
> > >   mprintk(&mp, "everything seems dandy\n");
> > 
> > I prefer Matthew Wilcox's stringbuf approach which does proper memory
> > management and isn't specific to printk:
> > 
> > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.3/0517.html
> 
> Do you have any strong feelings whether we should merge my stringbufs or
> rusty's version?  I have no particular preference.

My vague recollection was that I preferred Rusty's. But it's been a
while.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/