On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:41:08PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:00 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > And mprintk the following.
> > 
> >  code:
> >   DEFINE_MPRINTK(mp, 2 * 80);
> > 
> >   mprintk_set_header(&mp, KERN_INFO "ata%u.%2u: ", 1, 0);
> >   mprintk_push(&mp, "ATA %d", 7);
> >   mprintk_push(&mp, ", %u sectors\n", 1024);
> >   mprintk(&mp, "everything seems dandy\n");
> 
> I prefer Matthew Wilcox's stringbuf approach which does proper memory
> management and isn't specific to printk:
> 
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.3/0517.html

Do you have any strong feelings whether we should merge my stringbufs or
rusty's version?  I have no particular preference.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/