On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:11:47 +0100
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

quoted text
> > And even in that four-liner, I suspect that the *last* two lines are 
> > actually incorrect: there's no point in updating the file time when the 
> > page *becomes* dirty,
> 
> Actually all four lines do that.  The first two for a write access on
> a present, read-only pte, the other two for a write on a non-present
> pte.
> 
> > we should update the file time when it is marked 
> > clean, and "msync(MS_SYNC)" should update it as part of *that*.
> 
> That would need a new page flag (PG_mmap_dirty?).  Do we have one
> available?

I thought the page writing stuff looked at (and cleared) the pte
dirty bit, too?

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/