Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...>, <ak@...>, <ebiederm@...>, <rdreier@...>, <torvalds@...>, <gregkh@...>, <airlied@...>, <davej@...>, <tglx@...>, <hpa@...>, <akpm@...>, <arjan@...>, <jesse.barnes@...>, <davem@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, January 18, 2008 - 12:10 pm

On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:04:10PM -0800, Venki Pallipadi wrote:

The patch does not fix the problem. The conflicting cache attributes are
still there.

I have done another test after I have added a debug message in iounmap
when a direct mapping gets removed. (See boot-exregion-2.log)
For the address in question this gives:

# grep c04 boot-exregion-2.log

ioremap: addr c0403104, size fc
ioremap: addr c0403184, size 7c
ioremap: addr c040310a, size f6
ioremap: addr c040310a, size f6
ioremap: addr c040310a, size f6
ioremap: addr c040310a, size f6
ioremap: addr c040318a, size 76
ioremap: addr c0403104, size fc
ioremap: addr c0403104, size fc
ioremap: addr c0403184, size 7c
ioremap: addr c0403104, size fc
ioremap: addr c0403184, size 7c
ioremap_nocache: addr c0400000, size 1000
iounmap: addr c0400000, size 1000
ioremap_nocache: addr c0401000, size 1000
iounmap: addr c0401000, size 1000
ioremap_nocache: addr c0402000, size 1000
iounmap: addr c0402000, size 1000
ioremap: addr c0403104, size fc
ioremap: addr c0403184, size 7c
ioremap_nocache: addr c0403000, size 200
swapper:1 conflicting cache attribute c0403000-c0404000 uncached<->default
    ...


Regards,

Andreas
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 3:12 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 5:03 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 5:42 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:26 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 7:06 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:16 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Jan 24, 4:22 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:06 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:52 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Fri Jan 18, 12:10 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Fri Jan 18, 1:13 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 7:24 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Thu Jan 17, 7:42 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 3:54 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Wed Jan 16, 6:14 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Wed Jan 16, 3:05 pm)