Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » January » 18

Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@...>
To: Giacomo A. Catenazzi <cate@...>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, David Schwartz <davids@...>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <clameter@...>, <penberg@...>
Subject: Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?
Date: Friday, January 18, 2008 - 10:39 am

On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:47:01PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
...

You think that I try to put more meaning into const than I do - but I don't.

Please read what I wrote, not what you want to think I wrote.

I agree that if I said what you seem to imply I said, then I would have been
wrong. But I didn't so I'm not ;)


-- 

 / jakob

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jan 17, 5:25 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Jakob Oestergaard, (Fri Jan 18, 5:48 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Björn, (Fri Jan 18, 9:31 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Jakob Oestergaard, (Fri Jan 18, 10:53 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, (Fri Jan 18, 7:47 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Vadim Lobanov, (Fri Jan 18, 3:06 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Jakob Oestergaard, (Fri Jan 18, 10:39 am)
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, David Schwartz, (Thu Jan 17, 6:28 pm)
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jan 17, 7:10 pm)
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, David Schwartz, (Thu Jan 17, 8:56 pm)
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jan 17, 9:15 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Giacomo Catenazzi, (Fri Jan 18, 3:51 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Vadim Lobanov, (Fri Jan 18, 4:30 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Giacomo Catenazzi, (Fri Jan 18, 4:20 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Andy Lutomirski, (Fri Jan 18, 9:54 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Vadim Lobanov, (Fri Jan 18, 3:14 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Zan Lynx, (Fri Jan 18, 3:31 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Vadim Lobanov, (Fri Jan 18, 3:55 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Andy Lutomirski, (Fri Jan 18, 9:53 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Olivier Galibert, (Fri Jan 18, 1:24 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, J.A. , (Fri Jan 18, 6:29 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Krzysztof Halasa, (Fri Jan 18, 7:44 pm)
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, David Schwartz, (Fri Jan 18, 1:02 am)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, DM, (Fri Jan 18, 2:06 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Olivier Galibert, (Fri Jan 18, 1:37 pm)
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Jan 18, 12:10 pm)
RE: Why is the kfree() argument const?, David Schwartz, (Fri Jan 18, 4:55 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Chris Friesen, (Fri Jan 18, 11:38 am)