Andi Kleen wrote:Well, simulators are generally expected to follow the architecture, not vice versa. I would tend to agree with the coupling that recent versions of Bochs appeared to have made here -- I think we're unlikely to see any processors with sse2 sans clflush, so keeping code branches in which will never be executed seems like a bad idea in the long term. I'm much more worried about the possibility of embedded 64-bit CPUs who try to skimp on SSE2 than CLFLUSH. Now, that being said, this being encapsulated in the required set (and unified, which means the branches will be executed on 32-bit hardware) it seems the impact of leaving them in is small for now. We can re-evaluate that as appropriate. Either way, we should *not* have #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 around usage sites, circumventing the master switch. It either goes in the required masks or it doesn't. OK, so we're talking about outdated versions of Bochs, then? -hpa --
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 010/196] Chinese: add translation of Codingstyle |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 24/37] dccp: Processing Confirm options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| david | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
