Re: [PATCH] x86: make clflush a required feature on x86_64

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, <tglx@...>, <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, January 18, 2008 - 2:54 am

> Simulators can be fixed, 

They could, but why? I don't know of a good reason to require CLFLUSH.


I don't know of any specific ones that lack CLFLUSH, although Bochs
definitely had similar problems in the past.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: make clflush a required feature on x86_64, Kyle McMartin, (Fri Jan 18, 12:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: make clflush a required feature on x86_64, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Jan 18, 2:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: make clflush a required feature on x86_64, Andi Kleen, (Fri Jan 18, 2:54 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: make clflush a required feature on x86_64, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Jan 18, 9:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: make clflush a required feature on x86_64, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Jan 18, 1:04 am)
[PATCH] x86_64: remove redundant cpu_has_ definitions, Kyle McMartin, (Fri Jan 18, 1:25 am)