Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2008 - 5:24 pm

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:


yes. Stefano said the b43 driver is OK. The full fix is queued up for 
2.6.25. (it involved changing printk.c, etc., which didnt seem warranted 
- especially since the use of sched_clock() by printk was already quite 
incorrect.)

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Jan 17, 4:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Andrew Morton, (Thu Jan 17, 4:58 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jan 17, 5:18 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 17, 5:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Dave Kleikamp, (Fri Jan 18, 6:52 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Jan 18, 7:10 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jan 18, 7:12 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Jan 18, 7:35 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23, Takashi Iwai, (Fri Jan 18, 7:43 am)