Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@...>, Daniel Phillips <phillips@...>, Bryan Henderson <hbryan@...>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, David Chinner <dgc@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Rik van Riel <riel@...>, Valerie Henson <val.henson@...>
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2008 - 7:18 pm

Theodore Tso wrote:

Even if true (which I doubt), this is not implemented.

A modern drive can have 16-32 MB of write cache. Worst case, those 
sectors are not sequential which implies lots of head movement.


I can tell you directly that when you drop power to a drive, you will 
lose write cache data if the write cache is enabled. With barriers 
enabled, our testing shows that file systems survive power failures 
which routinely caused corruption without them ;-)

ric


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Tue Jan 8, 5:22 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Alan, (Tue Jan 8, 5:31 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jan 9, 5:16 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Daniel Phillips, (Sat Jan 12, 7:55 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Rik van Riel, (Tue Jan 8, 5:41 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Wed Jan 9, 12:40 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, , (Wed Jan 9, 4:04 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Valerie Henson, (Wed Jan 9, 3:45 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Wed Jan 9, 7:52 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Theodore Tso, (Sat Jan 12, 10:51 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Daniel Phillips, (Sun Jan 13, 8:22 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Pavel Machek, (Sun Jan 13, 1:19 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Ric Wheeler, (Mon Jan 14, 9:04 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Alan Cox, (Sun Jan 13, 1:41 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Increm..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Thu Jan 17, 8:29 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Increm..., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Jan 16, 12:38 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Increm..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Jan 17, 7:18 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Increm..., linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Fri Jan 18, 11:16 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Sun Jan 13, 7:05 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Rik van Riel, (Wed Jan 9, 10:44 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Thu Jan 10, 9:26 am)