Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@...>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <Linux-tiny@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2008 - 6:44 pm

On Jan 17 2008 18:05, Michael Opdenacker wrote:

Hardly. No. Absolutely not. pcspeaker.c is a mere 20 lines - when
compiled (on x86_64) a mere 1824 bytes (and most of that is probably
ELF overhead). If you build that as a module, be sure to add an extra
6 to 7 kilobyte as module overhead. No, this is not really worth it.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c c..., Michael Opdenacker, (Thu Jan 17, 11:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Michael Opdenacker, (Thu Jan 17, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Jan 17, 6:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional , Michael Opdenacker, (Thu Jan 17, 6:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Michael Opdenacker, (Fri Jan 18, 8:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Michael Opdenacker, (Fri Jan 18, 9:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Michael Opdenacker, (Fri Jan 18, 12:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: , Rob Landley, (Sun Jan 20, 8:25 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: , Michael Opdenacker, (Wed Jan 23, 6:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Michael Opdenacker, (Mon Jan 21, 11:31 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: , Rob Landley, (Sun Jan 20, 12:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Michael Opdenacker, (Fri Jan 18, 4:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker..., Michael Opdenacker, (Thu Jan 17, 2:32 pm)