Re: Linux 2.6.16.58

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2008 - 5:48 pm

On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 08:02:19PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

Well, since there are commands that work on this (push and log at
least), I believe that some operations could succeed. I *know* that
remote cloning was impossible, and it *looked* like pulling too was
during my attempts to fix the problem before understanding its root
cause. It is possible that I cumulated problems though, if at least
two people could pull from it.

Cheers,
Willy

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.16.58, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Jan 15, 6:18 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Jiri Kosina, (Wed Jan 16, 12:04 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jan 17, 4:34 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Jan 17, 5:12 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jan 17, 5:47 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Jan 17, 5:32 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Thu Jan 17, 6:02 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Jan 17, 5:48 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Fri Jan 18, 8:24 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58, Willy Tarreau, (Wed Jan 16, 4:14 pm)