Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andreas Herrmann3 <andreas.herrmann3@...>
Cc: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...>, <ak@...>, <ebiederm@...>, <rdreier@...>, <torvalds@...>, <gregkh@...>, <airlied@...>, <davej@...>, <tglx@...>, <hpa@...>, <akpm@...>, <arjan@...>, <jesse.barnes@...>, <davem@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <suresh.b.siddha@...>
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2008 - 5:22 pm

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:


btw., there's a change i did in today's x86.git: _all_ the old BIOS data 
accesses now go through early_ioremap(). This cleaned up the boot code 
quite significantly, as it's much more apparent now when we access a 
BIOS data table. (it also solves the problem when BIOS data pages are in 
reserved areas that we map via UC or dont map at all)

the same happens with all ISA ioremaps as well - no more "low 1MB is 
treated special" exceptions.

[ This also solves the 'EFI puts data pages into really high memory we
  dont have mapped yet' category of problems that BIOS writers are
  apparently busy creating right now ;-) ]

the downside is that old linear-mapped assumptions might now result in 
an early fault - boot with earlyprintk=vga or 
earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200. I fixed most such assumptions already 
and booted an allyesconfig kernel on both 32-bit and 64-bit x86, but a 
few more remain still. I've enhanced the early fault printout code as 
well to make it easier to debug such things, so it should be relatively 
easy to find the rest.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 3:12 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 5:03 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 5:42 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:26 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 7:06 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:16 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Jan 24, 4:22 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:06 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 6:52 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Fri Jan 18, 12:10 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Fri Jan 18, 1:13 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 7:24 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Thu Jan 17, 7:42 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 17, 5:22 pm)
Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Andreas Herrmann3, (Thu Jan 17, 3:54 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Wed Jan 16, 6:14 pm)
RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and ..., Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Wed Jan 16, 3:05 pm)