Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <penberg@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - 6:20 pm

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Johannes Weiner wrote:


Correct and we have gcc 4.2 currently spitting out warnings because of 
casting to non const. Any idea how to convince gcc that this is okay?
 
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Why is the kfree() argument const?, Johannes Weiner, (Wed Jan 16, 12:32 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Jan 16, 2:39 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Jan 16, 6:33 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Johannes Weiner, (Wed Jan 16, 6:19 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Jan 16, 7:16 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 16, 6:20 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Jan 16, 7:18 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Johannes Weiner, (Wed Jan 16, 7:13 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Johannes Weiner, (Wed Jan 16, 6:37 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jan 16, 12:48 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Pekka J Enberg, (Wed Jan 16, 1:45 pm)
Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?, Bernd Petrovitsch, (Wed Jan 16, 1:34 pm)