Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - 1:05 pm

Ingo Molnar wrote:

Hm, this seems fairly wide-ranging.  How about just making it signed?  
In fact, all these masks which are of the form "all high bits set, some 
low bits clear" (or perhaps "all set except some") should be signed, so 
that the "all high bits set" property is maintained when its extended to 
larger types.

Also, Andi, do you want to get rid of the PHYSICAL_MASK stuff?

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 15, 6:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 7:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 10:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 10:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 11:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jan Beulich, (Wed Jan 16, 11:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 1:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 4:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 4:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 5:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 5:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Jan 16, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 1:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 12:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 11:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jan 15, 8:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 3:25 am)
[PATCH 1 of 4] x86: refactor mmu ops in paravirt.h, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
[PATCH 3 of 4] x86: clean up pte_modify, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] x86: clean up pte_modify, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jan 15, 8:43 pm)
[PATCH 2 of 4] x86: fix warning, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
[PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Hugh Dickins, (Fri Jan 18, 9:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jan 18, 11:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jan 18, 10:01 am)