Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - 11:26 am

On Wednesday 16 January 2008 15:54:27 Ingo Molnar wrote:

I covered that in the end of the email.

Yes, but if you cast to long the result will be 32bit again. Or do you
rely on it being always used in 64bit signed context with sign extension?
While that might work it would seem rather fragile to me, just asking
for similar future bugs.

-Andi

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 15, 6:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 7:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 10:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 10:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 11:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jan Beulich, (Wed Jan 16, 11:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 1:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 4:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 4:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 5:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 5:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Jan 16, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 1:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 12:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 11:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jan 15, 8:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 3:25 am)
[PATCH 1 of 4] x86: refactor mmu ops in paravirt.h, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
[PATCH 3 of 4] x86: clean up pte_modify, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] x86: clean up pte_modify, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jan 15, 8:43 pm)
[PATCH 2 of 4] x86: fix warning, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
[PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Hugh Dickins, (Fri Jan 18, 9:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jan 18, 11:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jan 18, 10:01 am)