Re: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Newall <davidn@...>
Cc: David P. Reed <dpreed@...>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...>, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Christer Weinigel <christer@...>, Ondrej Zary <linux@...>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Paul Rolland <rol@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, rol <rol@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - 10:55 am

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:06:24 +1030
David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com> wrote:


Wrong. It's a careful designed solution used by all sorts of code for
over 15 years.

 The task to be performed is to delay for some period

Wrong, it is for some number of bus clocks which is why I/O cycles are
used


Wrong again.


Correctness, who needs correctness ?

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay ove..., Christer Weinigel, (Mon Jan 7, 11:15 pm)
Re: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port..., Alan Cox, (Wed Jan 16, 10:55 am)