Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - 10:44 am

> Index: linux-x86.q/include/asm-x86/page.h


I haven't tested yet, but we looked at that one earlier and I thought
it was ok because 

#define __PHYSICAL_MASK          _AT(phys_addr_t, (_AC(1,ULL) << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1)

and 

typedef u64     phys_addr_t;

for PAE. So the expression above should have been already 64bit.




That would mean it is 32bit again because 32bit long is 32bit, but on 32bit 
PAE PTE_MASK definitely needs to be 64bit.

So I would be surprised if the patch works.

The problem seems to be rather that PAGE_MASK does not include the bits above 32bit. 
Something like

#define PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK (__PHYSICAL_MASK & ~(phys_addr_t)(PAGE_SIZE-1))

should work (untested) 

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 15, 6:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 7:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 10:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 10:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 11:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jan Beulich, (Wed Jan 16, 11:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 1:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 4:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 4:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 5:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 5:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Jan 16, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jan 16, 1:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 12:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 11:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jan 15, 8:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jan 16, 3:25 am)
[PATCH 1 of 4] x86: refactor mmu ops in paravirt.h, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
[PATCH 3 of 4] x86: clean up pte_modify, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] x86: clean up pte_modify, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jan 15, 8:43 pm)
[PATCH 2 of 4] x86: fix warning, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
[PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jan 15, 6:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Hugh Dickins, (Fri Jan 18, 9:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Jan 18, 11:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jan 18, 10:01 am)