On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:03:17 +0800, Dave Young said:
quoted text
> On Jan 16, 2008 5:46 PM, Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@bitwizard.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I  wrote a small app yesterday that updates a file by mmapping the
> > file (RW), changing the thing around, and then exiting.
> >
> > This did not trigger a change in the mtime of the file. Thus rsync
> > didn't pick up that the file had changed.
> >
> > I understand that tracking every change to a RW mmapped file is
> > costly, and thus unfeasable, but shouldn't then the close cause a
> > mtime update?
> >
> > The server where this happened is running 2.6.21, so my apologies if
> > this has already been corrected.
> 
> This is an old bug, don't know if it was fixed or not. Please see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/17/138

If it was fixed, we'd not be having the currently ongoing long thread about how
to fix it. :)

See also:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/21/242
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/7/234

(Note the last is the start of the *current* thread...)