On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:37:37 +0200, =?utf-8?q?S=2E=C3=87a=C4=9Flar?= Onur said:Playing devil's advocate here - the claim is that EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is to indicate that code is getting too chummy with Linux internals. However, in *this* case, isn't it "code that is too chummy with *GCC* internals", and thus it isn't our place to say what can and can't be done with code that is derivative of the GCC compiler? ;)
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Andy Whitcroft | clam |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Lovich, Vitali | RE: [PATCH] Packet socket: mmapped IO: PACKET_TX_RING |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
