> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:07:20PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Linus Torvalds (
torvalds@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Well, it goes along the lines of the patch I suggested as a reply to
> > > > Adrian, with these differences :
> > > >
> > > > - I still source the kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation file.
> > > > - I put back the missing OPROFILE options directly in arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > >
> > > > Then end result is the same as your patch, but without the code
> > > > duplication.
> > >
> > > No it's not.
> > >
> > > Now the config variables may all be there, but the UI for the *menu*
> > > system is broken (ie all the ARM profiling config options are now outside
> > > the profiling menu).
> > >
> > > Is that menu really needed? I dunno. But since it exists, it should be
> > > correct.
> > >
> > > Linus
> >
> > There is an "instrumentation menu removal" patchset I've submitted to
> > Andrew for the next release cycle that moves the instrumentation menu
> > content into General setup (I did this following your advice).
> >
> > Furthermore, on ARM, the OPROFILE_ARMV6, OPROFILE_MPCORE and
> > OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE are all "bool , default y" (equivalent to the
> > preferred def_bool y). Unless I am grossly mistaken, this is not
> > supposed to show up in the menus; it's just selected when the
> > dependencies are met.
>
> This was the patch:
> +if OPROFILE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_ARMV6
> + def_bool y
> + depends on CPU_V6 && !SMP
> + select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_MPCORE
> + def_bool y
> + depends on CPU_V6 && SMP
> + select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> + bool
> +
> +endif
>
> And none of these has a prompt defined so they do not show up
> as a menu.
> It is very easy to test if you have the patch applied.
> No cross toolchin is needed - just do:
> make ARCH=arm menuconfig
>
> Sam
